Essay about Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Hebrews

Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Hebrews

August 10th, 1994

Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Hebrews

Their advancement from the 3rd millennium to 2nd C. E.

If the canonization from the Hebrew O (" TaNaKh" ) came about.

Frank Mancini

[email protected] netcom. com


Mesopotamia was your land of 4 primary civilizations: the Sumerian, the Akkadians, the Babylonian and the Assyrians. The Hebrews, like the Akkadians, belong to a group of people known as Semites and following that we can see the influence of Mesopotamian culture in some of the Hebrews traditions. During the same time, civilization began in Egypt, and there can be found a distinct difference in the social, religious and political program from Mesopotamia; that the website link between the two civilizations would be the Hebrews, and although not any historical documents are available aside from the Holy Scriptures, it is thought that the Hebrews settled in Egypt through the era of Hyksos dominance, superiority in the seventeenth century B. C. E. These 3 civilizations to be discussed were the foundation of today's world and presented the common age with tangible religious morals still applied today.

Proof of the technicians on the advancement of interpersonal, religious and political principles, as well as the fluctuating development of the role of girls then and today, are present during these documents, you start with the oldest document which is most likely the Epic of Gilgamesh, first passed on by word of mouth and later recorded by Sumerians surrounding the third centuries and finally modified and drafted down in cuneiform by the Babylonians.

This kind of legend has been used by all of the civilizations in Mesopotamia to be able to satisfy the need to learn why we all die and justify the instincts that drove the individuals of these societies to warfare, to kill and to control as a must for success. The gods were the sole outlet available to justify such behavior to grant authorization to rule, to kill and subdue the weak.

The Legendary of Gilgamesh does exactly that: It serves as a model to get the soldier, the full and the tragic hero plus the standards to get divine correct, friendship, brotherhood and dedication. Finally, it might be evident right from the start of a bigger consciousness that justifies like, brotherhood and loyalty in the middle of this need for war and gods.

The Epic can be divided into seven main parts: the " Coming of Enkidu", the " Forest Journey", " Ishtar", the " Seek out Everlasting Life", the " Story from the Flood", the " Return", and the " Death of Gilgamesh".

The Creation of life was, and is, a mystery and therefore must be justified as it reveals in the " Coming of Enkidu", in which he was created by simply Aruru simply by dipping " her hands in water and pinching off clay" (EOG 62). Clay was the most used material with the times, utilized to create set ups from stones to cookware and so applied from the gods to create person.

In the " Forest Journey", there is reason used by Gilgamesh and Enkidu to kill Humbaba, the guardian from the cedar forest, by labels him bad, in order to match the need for lumber by overcoming the forest. The value of dreams is especially noted in this section and " Ishtar". Dreams, a combination of actuality and imagination, where peculiar and relatively unexplainable thoughts which were believed to play a component in a connection system between gods plus the people.

The roles of ladies in the Impressive are blended. Women will be represented since harlots, because wise so that as gods, to present multiple feelings in regards to these people. There are a substantial amount of gods that happen to be represented as women and it might represent a society with multiple views towards ladies. A society where zero definitive group of rules were made for women and possibly more open to a equivalent perspective.

In " Ishtar", the feelings of hate, like, rejection and punishment arrive to the surface area as to show that eradicating was not for any to do that is certainly permissible into a king two-thirds god rather than to...

Bibliography: B. Ness, Class notes, Oct. six, 1994.

Cultures of the Western, Volume 1. Brief Model. Grieves, 3rd there’s r., R. Zaller, J. Capital t. Roberts. (HarperCollins, 1994). Pg. 9


N. Ness, School notes, Sept. 8, 1994.

B. Ness, Class records, Sept. 13, 1994.

W. Ness, Course notes, Sept. 22, 1994.

The Legendary of Gilgamesh, (Penguin Classics, 1972). Pg. 97.

M. Ness, Class notes, September. 20, 1994.

B. Ness, Class notes, Sept. twenty-two, 1994.

Civilizations of the West, Volume One particular. Brief Model. Grieves, 3rd there’s r., R. Zaller, J. Big t. Roberts. (Harper Collins, 1994). Pg. 18


Classics of Western Believed, Volume My spouse and i. The Historic World. Gochberg, S. Jesse. (Harcourt Splint Jovanovich, Fourth Edition, 1988). Pg. 5iphon scam. (Footnote # 20).

N. Ness, Course notes, September. 20, 1994.